this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
323 points (99.4% liked)

science

29414 readers
774 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why are "natural scientists" horrible?

I apologise for the misunderstanding. What I meant was that if people would trust businesspeople over natural scientists in matters of social issues, that is already bad, but if people would trust businesspeopls over social scientists in matters of social issues, that's a significantly worse judgement to make.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Why are "social scientists" horrible? What's the difference? jfc.

TBH the attack on "social science" is a longstanding fascist project to impose social oppression.

I completely agree.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah I mean, I don't disagree. I was just taken aback that they mentioned "natural scientists"