this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
405 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

88825 readers
3437 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

If AI makes you twice as productive, and there's fewer taxes on spending money for tokens than there is for spending money on salaries, the rational amount for a corporation to spend on it is more than a human's entire salary, per person working with it.

Naively assuming corporations approximate rational actors, and AI does measurably improve productivity, this implies a gain of roughly 2% if these employees are earning federal minimum wage, or well below 1% if they earn average software developer wages.

Maybe their contract deliverables are poorly suited to this use case or something, but if they are given a fixed amount of money to produce some software item, then it makes sense to prioritize productivity per dollar.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

How many companies allow their employees to also be employed by their competitors?

Your idea of an AI being like an employee only if there's an AI company that will agree to an exclusive contract or at the very least respect data ownership and respect privacy. Is there an AI company that's like that?

[–] j_j@muenchen.social 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

@prime_number_314159
Maybe their business model does not depend on productivity. If the rate they charge for a developer with AI and without AI is approximately the same, they rather sell two people than making one more productive.
@FirmDistribution

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

Generally in the consulting business you'd just have your employees bill more hours than actually worked if they're being more productive than average. Obviously without telling your clients.

For government contracts it's not unusual that the agreed upon hours estimate is what is billed regardless of whether you actually spend more or less time.