this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2026
1162 points (98.5% liked)
Memes
17361 readers
1599 users here now
Post memes here.
A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.
An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.
- Wait at least 2 months before reposting
- No explicitly political content (about political figures, political events, elections and so on), !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca can be better place for that
- Use NSFW marking accordingly
Laittakaa meemejä tänne.
- Odota ainakin 2 kuukautta ennen meemin postaamista uudelleen
- Ei selkeän poliittista sisältöä (poliitikoista, poliittisista tapahtumista, vaaleista jne) parempi paikka esim. !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
- Merkitse K18-sisältö tarpeen mukaan
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The thing is; Our "Imagination" lies. Our brains are especially good at forming concepts that are often snippets of visual echoes and linguistic narratives but don't form into anything concrete. In order to form a concrete visual idea you need to engage with visual concepts themselves. A character designer needs to have a grasp on human anatomy but there is design specific information like contrast and color balance, form, shape, line economy, design sense; then there is cultural information like emotional response to shape and color, particular fashion sense, cultural and environmental cues. All those are choices; a designer engages with them, interiorizes them, experiments and chooses what works best for them. Every Specific Area has different context and it's own sense of rules.
A Good character designer might think they would have good "visual ideas" for graphic design but in reality this won't be true until they engage with the particular context that is proper of graphic design. Since by using AI people are cutting themselves off to working with any visual concepts: (It's all linguistic descriptions) They are cutting themselves off from making decisions that are truly visual. They are clients. Just like the clients that hire an artist that more often than not, don't know what they want. But "think" they have an idea that is concrete in their heads. People that instead of immersing themselves in visual or cultural concepts take short hands. Reminds me of this thing of calling visual trends "punks" putting "cyberpunk", "cloud punk" or "hope punk" in their prompts. Oversimplification. Visual stupidity.
As for aphantasia; Supposedly I have it. Back in college it was impossible for me to visualize images. And I used to heavily forget faces, places or shapes. I confuse people I already know with other people, Images just don't stick in my head. But again. Visual education is not so much as a mental faculty but a system. I have a very particular system developed with experience and a formed visual language. So It doesn't matter that I can't visualize something in my head; Because I can get to any drawing pad and jot it down. Journaling is important for me. Often time I record the process I used to find a particular answer and keep them as "maps" to retrace my steps. As I developed more visually intelligence I got better at retaining images in my head. I feel my ADHD has a bit to do with it, because back when I was a kid it was difficult to find contextual cues, subtle proportional differences and cultural responses. I trained myself to get better at picking up on those over time, and my "aphantasia" feels less prominent today.
I think we're talking about separate things, you about those who don't fully know what they want to express, and that art comes from their attempt to express it, with the influences of their life experience, and should they offload that attempt to express a concept to AI they lose that idea (or never really knew it). I'm talking about those who do know what they want to express, visually, and regardless of the tools used, could look at the output and say with confidence 'that's not it'. It seems this is a bit foreign to you because you perhaps have never experienced seeing a full visual scene in your mind's eye, and known you are unable to draw/paint it with a level of fidelity that even approaches the visualisation. I can imagine all sorts of things, see them clearly in my head, and though my drawing skills aren't terrible, I couldn't reproduce them well. I could describe something linguistically, but have no interest in spending time using an AI to try to express it. That doesn't mean no people exist that have things in their heads that could be expressed via AI.
The thing Is I have seen my work being realized: through doing it. Through doing the hard work. I am not a musician but i love music, and I've done a couple of songs that i like by recording simple things and mixing them together. I don't have music in my head. I experimented, did the work. Made a mess.
I think the problem is that there is people out there that has never experienced the satisfaction of creating and want a palm in their back for not even trying! Thinking that they have fully realized ideas in their head is a great cop out for this.
Yes, we're most certainly talking about different things.