this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
442 points (94.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

34043 readers
1616 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johanno@feddit.org 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I am guessing that they are referring to the situation, that while all usb-c can be connected to each other you can have very different ones. Fast data transfer and slow. 10 watt and 100 watt and so on

[–] defiance@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Fair enough, but isnt most of that circumvented by getting good cables ?

Tbh USB-C was a godsend I bought in early but I prefer having to grapple wether my cables are up to par than if I have a fitting one at all :D

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I find the current situation much better than having 33 usb standards and a cable for each and 99 adapters....

So yes it is better. Every usbc cable will work (also I think there are less "power only" cables now)

[–] kus@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, the current situation with a baseline is definitely better than what it was before.

load more comments (1 replies)