this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
-15 points (29.7% liked)

Asklemmy

56109 readers
125 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the general inaccessibility of college in the US (with AGI, they're basically pay to play), would Chess or Go be a good qualifier for job mental acuity?

Both can be monitored on the spot and certified by third-party associations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What you're saying is if someone got good at chess then they would be better suited to succeed in college. There may be merit to that to some degree, but in the end, that person would be going to college to get a better education, and may have a leg up on other less analytical people. OP is suggesting replacing college with things like Chess or Go. College also teaches specifically in different fields. Knowing how to play Chess doesn't teach a person about seg faults, stack overflows, or computer architecture. A college can if that's the field a person decides to pursue.

[โ€“] lntl@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah, I see that. I read this as college admission, not the four year degree itself. In that case, no I don't really think it could be replaced.