this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2026
808 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

89533 readers
2712 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought someone did the math and said if all US billionaires were slaughtered and the money divided amongst US population, we'd all get like $400k+.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always wondered if it would've been cheaper in Iraq and Afghanistan to just pay everyone to hand over their weapons and leave.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That was literally the case for Vietnam. They already hated the Chinese, we just needed to invest in industry for them and they would have been our allies.

The only problem was that France didn't want that. They were too busy throwing a tantrum over losing their colony

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hell, we trained Ho Chi Minh in guerilla combat against the Japanese. The US was sympathetic to the independence of the old European colonies after the war. If it wasn't for the cold war and trying to woo France into NATO we likely would've sided with Vietnam.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IF the billionaires are really worth their money.
Unluckily the billionaires are only theoretically worth their money since it depends on the value of their shares in the companies, shares value that is only supposed.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

$400k in shares is still more than I have

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

$400K in shares is theoretically more than what you have.
There is no guarantee that this is what you will be paid once you sell the shares.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I guarantee it would still be more than I have