Linux

68542 readers

966 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

115

Linux 7.4 Sound Changes Merged: "The AI Flood Continues" (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 1 week ago by SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Linux sound subsystem maintainer Takashi Iwai of SUSE began the Linux 7.4 sound pull request by noting that "the AI flood continues" with there continuing to be a lot of new patches coming as a result of AI/LLM agents devising patches as well as uncovering new kernel bugs.

Takashi went on to explain that it was another busy cycle with changes in the sound subsystem from lots of core code hardening to new platforms and codecs as well. The core ALSA code has been hardened against some race conditions, there's a buffer leak fix in the compression offload code, race fixes in the JACK code, and other race conditions and more typical C bug fixes. The OSS sequencer emulation code has also been marked as deprecated for Linux 7.4.

On the hardware side, the Linux 7.4 sound updates include support for compressed audio playback on SOF IPC4 with Intel Tigerlake and newer. There is also AMD ACP 7.0/7.F sound IP support with SoundWire and the PDM controller. The new AMD ACP 7.0/7.F IP appears for upcoming Ryzen Zen 6 platforms.

There are also quirks for many different Intel/AMD laptops from the likes of Lenovo, ASUS, HP, AAcer, HONOR, MSI, and others.

New codec drivers are for the ESS ES9039Q2M, Nuvoton NAU83G60 amplifier, Senary SN624x SoundWire SDCA codec.

Also new is the Qualcomm QAIF driver for their Shikra platform.

More details on the many sound changes for Linux 7.4 via this pull ( https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87ecdgc246.wl-tiwai@suse.de/ ).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't say 7.4 is slop. You spoke against people who are anti-slop, which generally suggests pro-slop.

Can't wait for this anti-AI slop to stop.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think this is the first one that's actually pro slop.

So, what is the "actually pro slop" part of original comment? It sounds like the poster just said something against hype culture (either pro or anti) and you jumped to default trash mode.

What is the actual complaint (if any) that you have?

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're talking about people who are "anti AI slop" which is a weird stance to take. Slop bad. LLMs are just tools, which can be misused, but slop always bad.

[–] Tempy@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think some punctuation would have made his sentence make more sense. I think he was saying, a lot of the anti AI stuff that is made, is slop in its own right, and he can't wait for it to stop.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 3 points 1 week ago

What's weird is it isn't even about AI generated code, but the disclosure of it via tag. It's kinda redundantly stupid given the same PR with or without the tag is still subject to the same review process.

Slop code (AI or human generated) gets eliminated at that point. There is no practical reason for people to throw a tantrum over this. The argument I know someone will try to make is that there are too many AI PRs and they need a way to distinguish from them. The problem is that just means the review process is "What flair did you use?" which is not a process at all.