this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
322 points (99.7% liked)

science

29539 readers
217 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

"Would love to actually see anti-matter" - are you being literal here? because that would require a vacuum between your eyes and antimatter that emits at a visible frequency. Not entirely impossible, but detection and recording of an anti-hydrogen transition wavelength is more easily achievable. This might be no more than an LCD display indicating a non-zero number though. Exciting for sure, but not necessarily a visual spectacle.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You did not just write "LCD display". Feel ashamed! >:V

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Other display technologies can't properly reflect the real level of awsomeness in what can be seen about that positron.

Even good old CRT would be cooler than LCD nowadays.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As long as it isn't a liquid LCD display.

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] incompetent@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Or a digital DSL line.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, to highlight how dull witnessing antimatter could actually be for a non-scientist. LOL. -- Oh crap, I just poured granola in my coffee instead of my yogurt parfait.

Edit: ah yes well we don't see many LCDs anymore so I give a hint for touchscreen kids who might not know what LCD means (not Least Common Denominator).

[–] mildseason@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah very literal. Would need millions of atoms of the stuff. Actually maybe that's too dangerous lol

We have managed to see a single strontium atom - link. Maybe that's attainable with anti-matter.

But yeah you're right, capturing an anti-hyrdogen emission would be an huge achievement itself!

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Make the glass of anti water on the moon just in case heh.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Just for fun I did the Maths.

Rougly a 100ml glass of anti-water has 100g of anti-water (assuming same density as normal pure water, which is around 1).

When anti-mater contacts mater it transforms into energy according to E = mc^2^ were E is in Joule and m is in kg.

For 100g of anti-water to turn into energy in this way it also needs 100g of normal mater, so the number is doubled.

Using the rounded 300,000,000 m/s for the constant c, the energy released by the annihilation of a 100ml glass of anti-water (and the matching 100g of normal mater) would be 1.8e+16 Joules, equivalent to around 4.3 Megatons of TNT.

So basically a regular nuclear bomb.

PS: I actually expected it would be much more energy before I did the maths.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shit. See, I already blew the moon up.