this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2026
579 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

89099 readers
3916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 40 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

AI policies are so dumb. You don't evaluate people's perfs on how much they use a tool. So what's the damn end goal of such evaluation??

"Hey! I did nothing useful this year, but all with AI! -You're promoted!!

I fixed hundreds of bugs and developed 3 new features all cheered by users! -With AI? -Err... not much -You're fired!!"

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The policy my company has implemented is the opposite. AI use is allowed, but no confidential client information is to be sent to any cloud AI service. Logic is that if we don't have an actual NDA with OpenAI (or whoever), their privacy policy is not robust enough for us to take on that liability.

Interested in your thoughts on that!

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

For the LLMs killer feature, software development, you don't really need confidential information 99% of the time.

It continues to annoy me how both haters and glazers will over-simplify the topic by calling everything AI. There's a giant difference in usefulness, ethics, and quality between LLMs that produce code guided by an experienced developer, and "art" slopped out for greed by some random schmo.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

Multiple companies have that approach, I'm not denying there ARE companies doing things right (or at least better).

I work in a company using multiple agents. One of them is supposed to be off Internet, and even with that one we're not to share sensitive IP.

But Proton is not an isolated case. I bet some execs have invested and promised so much they need to report some good numbers on usage, and you can't make up productivity improvement if there are people left getting as much done without AI.