this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
996 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

89137 readers
3533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Solar is great for where it's sunny. Not as great where it's not.

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not true. Modern solar tech no longer needs direct sunlight and will still generate a good amount of power in overcast conditions.

That does mean you need more panels for the same output, yup. Good news is panels have become so cheap that it's not remotely a deal breaker.

Shit has been bleak out there but the advances in solar tech are incredible and legit one of the most positive and exciting things going on right now.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree in general but as someone who lives in a place that's grey much of the year and have evaluated solar for my location, the ROI is not amazing, and it's pretty useless during winter. Even at current prices.

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ha! I have done the same evaluation for my location (also grey much of the year) and came to the opposite conclusion. I do have reservations about winter, but they're more about the duration of the day. Thankfully that's also when we get a lot of wind.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You gonna do home wind turbines?

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, you gonna do home nuclear?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They do have home wind turbines but they don't look that practical.

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Yeah. Wind (plus batteries) will likely have to remain a grid thing for the days when the sun just won't cut it. I'd like to get to full autonomy mostly for peace of mind reasons but I don't see that happening, barring storage advances that would allow storing power across seasons.

Still, mostly full solar with a wind-powered grid as backup would already be amazing, and it's just plain fantastic that we're making good progress in that direction.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your place is not the world. In general PV is working fine.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago

Depends on geography but yes it works fine in many places.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

It's even better than you think. Organic and semi-organic solar panels are improving fast, so even disposing of the toxic metals involved in their manufacturing is likely to become a problem of the past.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

True, but:

  • Most of the world is actually quite sunny
  • High-voltage electrical grid can carry power for thousands of kilometers if needed. Granted, there is some loss of power and maintenance overhead, but at the current rate, economics can still go in favor of this option.
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 20 hours ago

Yeah I hope for Europe they just do some big farms in Spain and Morroco and make a really good grid for the rest of Europe.