this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
999 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

89137 readers
3533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world -4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

People say nuclear power is cheap, but I love near a failed nuclear plant that was too expensive to ever turn on. Nuclear shills consistently downvote me for this, but like I’m sorry, I’m just not very impressed by how “cheap” this technology is. I understand that it’s cheap once it’s running, but crucially, that doesn’t matter because it’s so dang expensive to get it running in the first place.

I also love that lemmy is apparently big enough to get nuclear shills

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

Nuclear plants that are already running are very cheap to continue running.

That's mostly beside the point, though, because, as you explain, they're very expensive to construct, and that's before even getting to the ones that never get completed because the cost overruns get the project canceled.

So I'm always in favor of running existing nuclear plants as long as possible, but am pretty skeptical of building any new nuclear plants.