this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
76 points (97.5% liked)

Linux

19760 readers
14 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
warmaster@lemmy.world
76
On mint for a while now, people usually call mint a newbie distro, any reason to "upgrade" to a different distro? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago by SlayersFan@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.world
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi, how's it going? I've been daily driving mint with i3 for a while now, (takes like 500mb idle ram) but I always hear mint being called a newbie distro, I know arch is harder to set up and more customizable for example, but overall im wondering, in which cases one would go from mint to another distro? what can make other distros "better" than mint? i'll end up using a window manager (i3 or if thats not availible some other lightweight one) so differences in desktop environments i dont really care that much about

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JTode@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you're happy with things and nothing is acting weird or badly, You're more or less golden, like folks are saying.

Where you might find that one day you want a newer kernel or packages (which is why you'd switch to Arch or one of its derivatives), is if you ever have very new hardware (or very old hardware that just got a driver pulled into the kernel - I own a Digidesign 002Rack that is ancient, but someone finally wrote a driver for it, and it's still a great piece of audio hardware) that only has drivers in the latest kernels.

But if you're just doing web, Office type stuff, even Steam games, you shouldn't need anything more than you have already.

I am a fan of the KDE desktop, myself, and I recommend that everyone try it out at some point. But you should be able to install it onto Mint and just choose it when you login, again, no need to change distros.

[–] bertlewirth@lemy.lol 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a warning, installing too many WMs or DEs can cause….. issues. Two will probably be fine, but before you go wild and install all of them, just be wary as it can cause conflicts between apps and shit. So yeah, just be wary.

[–] JTode@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

On Debian I have freely installed Gnome, KDE, and one or the other of the LX ones, and had no perceptible problems.

However, I just tried to shortcut installing KDE on a vanilla Ubuntu, and boy, they don't handle that well.