this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2026
813 points (99.4% liked)

memes

23165 readers
2372 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtraJudgement@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Trouble is, the web for which the PageRank algorithm was developed has long since died - its highly decentralized, interlinked network of freely available information has almost entirely been replaced by centralized, account-gated silos. Web search engines, in turn, have gotten progressively worse since long before LLMs had become computationally feasible.

[–] eatshitforeverbutinaniceway@quokk.au 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

much of that, both the centralization opposed to search and the search degradation to force more searches and serve more adds, like the removal of advanced search operators, was deliberate.

[–] ExtraJudgement@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Eventually, yes. But many people don't like hearing that the vast majority of them, the users, didn't want to pay for the operating costs of a global search engine when the web got popular. Neither as customers of a company, nor via government spending as a public service, and definitely not through donations.

Hence, given the economic system we live in, the people running search engines had to find some means of funding, which turned out to be selling their users' data and serving them ads. Once they had gone down that path the rest became more or less inevitable.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 6 points 1 hour ago

I don't think users would ever be in a position to cover the many hundreds of billions in revenue that Google found. Yeah, somebody has to pay the running costs, but there's a place where the search engine could exist by just covering the running costs, without making infinite profit on top.

load more comments (1 replies)