this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
160 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

89311 readers
4261 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The particles carry a customized dose of cancer antigens that can provoke a strong immune response against tumors.

A nanoscale particle with a unique structure, developed at MIT, holds potential as a customizable delivery vehicle for personalized cancer vaccines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Juviz@lemmy.zip 24 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Cancer vaccines aren’t what you usually have with vaccines. It’s not to prevent you from getting cancer. Instead you give the immune system a target to attack, as the main issue with cancer is, that your immune system can’t fight/see it due to evasion mechanisms.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not a researcher or anything, but in this case it does seem to prevent new cancer.

After vaccination with the higher-density particles, mice were much less likely to develop tumors when later exposed to melanoma cancer cells expressing the SIINFEKL antigen.

Essentially, they modified a harmless bacteriophage to carry a neoantigen common to a form of mouse colon cancer and provoke an immune response. This taught the mouse's immune system to attack when it detects that neoantigen in the future thus preventing tumor formation.

They did previously use a similar technique to attack existing mouse tumors and are working towards using it to treat other cancer types.

In this study, the researchers tested the vaccine as a way to prevent cancer from developing, and in their previous work, they adapted it for use to treat mouse colon tumors that have already formed. In the future, they also hope to use it to combat other types of cancer.

If a similar structure is found to be common in human colon cancer, a bacteriophage could be created to prompt a person's immune system to attack cancer cells as soon as they appear or treat people who already have colon cancer. This seems like a very exciting discovery if it translates to a human treatment.

[–] Juviz@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

While you are right in principle, what you are quoting is exactly what I was talking about. The cancer that was introduced to those mice was known beforehand and the vaccine adapted to it. Similar treatments have been available for melanoma for a few years. It’s actually insane considering how much of a death sentence skin cancer was when I was in med school 12 years ago.

However this is a case of similar antigens in different cancers. This is sadly not the norm. While this might have some effect in this very controlled experiment, a general vaccine is unlikely. We might be able to get immunization for specific cancer subtypes, what is nor likely though, is that we do molecular testing on a tumor and then apply targeted therapy as a vaccine.

We have a molecular tumor conference at our university where we apply exactly these principles. It’s a very exciting time and I see my future as a oncological surgeon somewhat endangered, however this type of treatment will still need decades to be brought to mainstream and most likely be extremely expensive in the beginning

Edit: I reread the whole article after my reply, it was not a case of cross tumor antigens, it was two different vehicles for different cancers, one melanoma, one colonic cancer. So no vaccine in the typical sense

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

My uneducated only reading your comment hot take is that it seems like a way to accidentally give yourself an autoimmune disease... But I guess if you already have cancer that might not be too big of a worry.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 15 points 20 hours ago

The trick is to find something that uniquely identifies the cancer cells and tell the immune system to attack that. If it says "attack everyone in a red shirt" but some normal liver cells have a red shirt, then you got a problem. But if only the cancer cells are wearing khakis, then you just identify that. It's the same principle as normal vaccines except that for cancers there's no single identifying trait for all people getting the cancer (even if it's the same type). For a virus it has the exact same trait across everyone who catches it until the virus itself mutates (which is why the flu gets a new vaccine each year to fight the most common mutation).

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The only difference is that your making your immune system target just those cancer cells and nothing else. It's extremely specific. Also it has to be because you and I are currently breeding our own unique cancers with no known vaccines.