this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2026
816 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

89409 readers
3589 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

A false accusation of theft is literally Libel.

So anybody rich enough or who is a Lawyer or Judge can easilly take them to Court for it and win compensation.

As with most nasty things, it's only done to the riff-raff, not the upper-middle and upper class.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A false accusation of theft is literally Libel

Not if it's only to you. Defamation happens when an accusation is published such that it could damage your reputation.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

True. If nobody else is told about it it's not Libel.

So they would have to stop that person not in public or very very discretely, only one person could be involved from their side (otherwise somebody would be telling somebody else) and the person stopped could simply refuse and walk away because if they called the authorities by telling them that person had stolen something, it would be Libel (or worse - I believe it's also a crime to falsely report a crime).

Ultimately, it boils down to had they witnessed it or not - had they seen it on camera then they did, had they just blindly relied on the AI flagging it without actually checking it, then they did not, and "the AI told us so" wouldn't fly in Court if they didn't cross-checked the AI system and it turned out they had made an accusation of a Crime against somebody to somebody else or the authorities without actually checking it.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 2 points 2 hours ago

if they called the authorities by telling them that person had stolen something, it would be Libel

It would not. I resent that. Libel is written. In speech, it's slander.