this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

15537 readers
271 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
09-03 SNW 4x07 “Like Chronitons Through the Hourglass”
09-10 SNW 4x08 “Orders of Magnitude”
09-17 SNW 4x09 "Once La’An a Time"
09-24 SNW 4x10 "Tomorrow's Enterprise"
03-?? SFA 2x01 TBA

Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi! After reading opinions for a long time, I've realized that some episodes are quite controversial nowadays. For example, Star Trek: Voyager Season 4, Episode 17, "Retrospect," has been compared to the #MeToo movement, with some people criticizing how it "handles rape culture unevenly" (as one IMDb review puts it).

This got me thinking: What other things do you feel Star Trek make wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's unclear in my viewing EXACTLY what life support is doing.

It's clear that it has very refined monitoring of compounds present, filtering mechanics, and essentially arbitrary disbursement of reagents.

LaForge: "Computer: flood cargo bay 2 with [the most exotic deep-cut compound that ever was]"

Barret: "Consider it done, I've got tons of that shit fucking ready to go and dumping it exactly in the one room is no fucking problem whatsoever"

It was my head cannon that starship operation leaked a ton of not great stuff into the air constantly, and that ongoing room-by-room analysis was always happening and carefully measured filtering and counter-disbursements was just constant. "Make oxygen" was part of it, but wasn't by a large margin the whole of it.

This is based on nothing other than my feeling that the atmospheric management systems were way too extra.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That's true. If you assume it's a lot more than just the O2 supply, it makes more sense. Ok. I have a new fun headcanon.

So, here's the thing. We know the Federation has multiple species in it. Those species likely have different atmospheric requirements. Sure, we sometimes see crew members wearing breathing apparatus, like the Benzites. But I wonder if every species actually needs its own atmospheric mix? Maybe every species has its own ideal mixture of oxygen, nitrogen, CO2, etc.

That is a problem if everyone has to share the same atmosphere. But what if they didn't have to? Imagine if the life support system is generating little individual micro atmospheric pockets for every person onboard. Every crew member basically gets to breathe the atmospheric mix of their home planet. Using transporters, force fields, replicators, and good-old-fashioned fans, the ship generates little atmospheric bubbles around each crew member. And those bubbles move with them through the ship.

So would anyone need a breathing apparatus? It's possible those species just have very unique air requirements that go beyond the capabilities of the life support system to handle. For example, maybe the Benzites require a gas that is poisonous to some other species? You don't want to make big pockets of that floating around. You minimize the amount of it introduced to the ship by using personal breathing devices.

This would also explain why the system is capable of dispersing arbitrary compounds.

But the need for constant filtration is an interesting point as well. Though that seems like less of an immediately lethal threat than a long-term exposure thing.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

For example, maybe the Benzites require a gas that is poisonous to some other species?

They do, yes.

But I wonder if every species actually needs its own atmospheric mix? Maybe every species has its own ideal mixture of oxygen, nitrogen, CO2, etc.

I don't think that they do, or if it does, it overlaps enough that it's effectively a non-existent difference. They would be much more visibly impaired going planetside otherwise, since the ship wouldn't be able to sustain it.