this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
495 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

89443 readers
4224 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 49 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Most people in jobs like this aren't paid hourly, they are salaried and expected to get the job done. Usually the problem isnt necessarily the runtime of an AI, but the inefficiency of a workflow that brought AI into its center.

It's like walking a child through how to cook a meal. Maybe it's technically less "work" since they are doing the chopping, measuring, stirring, etc, but it takes longer since you have to take time to be explicit about all your instructions, and correcting mistakes, etc. The difference is a child will eventually learn how to do it themselves, while in practice, and AI probably won't since it likely relies on inputs that can't just be piped in (cause if they could, you'd do the job with regular programming).

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Most people in jobs like this aren’t paid hourly, they are salaried and expected to get the job done. Usually the problem isnt necessarily the runtime of an AI, but the inefficiency of a workflow that brought AI into its center.

Sure, but if the tools provided/mandated by the employer are inadequate to do the job more efficiently. That should be the employers problem, not the employee's.

You can't as management both claim the need for AI out of efficiency, and blame it at the same time for you not getting your job done in time because of it. But then again, how often do you come across competent leadership these days. The lemon can always be squeezed a bit more I guess.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 36 points 21 hours ago

Management is not known for being rational in many workplaces.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

you speak in logical thought, but in my experience the boss does not care about that. you are expected to do the job in the time allotted and any failure is your responsibility even (and especially) if they pulled you off of that to deal with "more important" priorities in the middle of your work. you will be dinged for failing to complete it by deadline.

this was eventually used to justify laying me off at my last job even though i usually pulled it off.

[–] thinkingofyouihaveananxietydisorder@quokk.au 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

should

sorry, we live in capitalism, hbu?

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In a social democracy with workers rights, where if you got unjustifiably fired you can sue them for it. you?

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Funny enough some folks use AI agents to do the sueing. It's one of the aspects companies really don't like in the use of AI.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why would management even consider that they're contradicting themselves every 5 minutes? They're the ones that sign the paychecks, they can be absurd if they want to be. It's not like there's every going to be personal consequences anyway, and if the company burns to the ground, they've already got their golden parachute worked out.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They don't have to, just as much as you don't have to compensate for their shortcomings. Of course that's easier said then done if you work somewhere with little to no workers protection and fear losing your job. But that still doesn't make it right.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Of course that’s easier said then done if you work somewhere with little to no workers protection and fear losing your job.

That part. No one said it was right. It's simply what many of us have to put up with to survive. Building solidarity and unions in the current environment is difficult. Labour power has been set back almost to square one in a lot of places, and if you'll remember, building it up in the first place, cost a lot of lives and a lot of blood. It's really hard to be a martyr for the cause, when you know no one is going to step in to support the people who count on you, which is why organizing NGO support networks is so essential. They know that community is what gives us leverage, and that's why they do everything in their power to make community building seem futile.

We have no churches, because they've all been compromised. We have precious few non-corpo social clubs and sports orgs. Unions have been beaten into a bloody mess. We have a handful of charities and volunteer orgs, most of which are dependent on corporate grants donations for survival. I'm not saying it's hopeless, but we need to be clear where we are to figure out a path forward. We need to build communities of truth and trust beyond their reach if we're going to push back. Just saying "no" sounds great in principle... but we have to all say "no" together otherwise you're just lighting yourself on fire, and the machine will not even notice you're gone.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I know unions and workers rights are basically none existent across the pond. And I can only hope that changes for you guys. But I sure hope if I would get fired for doing as I'm told by management, that I can go to the union and/or judge to get compensation for being unjustly fired.

This shouldn't really be a discussion imho, but alas here we are.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

We're less far gone in Canada, but it's still bad. We're hanging on by our finger tips to worker's rights, the US is largely in free-fall. That said, they're doing their damnedest to run the same playbook in Europe and Britain, as I'm sure you're all too aware. Hang on to your community. Don't take it for granted. Work at it. Grow it. Build a wall (metaphorically) around it because they are going to try to break you the way they broke us. Don't let them divide you over petty things. Race, ethnicity, sexuality. They weaponize the wedges to divide and conquer. Repetition creates reality. Ritual is a defence against propaganda, don't be afraid to use it. They will mock you for using emotion, while weaponizing rage and hate. Stand together.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Also, anecdotally, if it's anything like my workplace then management is trying to nickel and dime the process so much that they refuse to invest in the people building the tools. They think because they build AI tools that they don't need actual humans on the team and can just "10x" everything so they're forced to try to make vast one-size-fits-all tools that are a mile wide and an inch deep

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Not to mention all the tools you use on a daily basis that have also adopted AI development causing them to behave erratically. I have been wrestling with the coderabbitai for the last two hours to get a PR finished.