this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
151 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

89443 readers
4463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They’re rapidly being converted into generators to meet A.I.’s insatiable demand for electricity. Environmentalists call it a step backward.

Archived copy of the article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] o8bepbua9@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Wow this can't be efficient. Jet engines are primarily designed to produce thrust. But looks like Musk got special permission from the state to pollute more, so all's good!

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Not really, the core of a modern turbofan produces rotational energy to drive the fan, the hot part of the engine produces little to no thrust.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It is. Jet engines are very efficient. But they also have to run high to reach that efficiency. But if you're running at high power for most of the time, like a jet aircraft or datacenter generator, then it makes sense. It doesn't matter whether your turbine shaft is connected to a fan or an electric generator rotor.

[–] o8bepbua9@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's true, it's not as bad as I was originally thinking. However, there's probably a reason traditional power plants never use jet engines for power production. According to this article, "But repurposed aircraft turbines tend to be less efficient and more polluting than engines designed for conventional gas-burning plants."

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

However, there's probably a reason traditional power plants never use jet engines for power production.

They don't use used jet engines, no. But a gas for a gas power plant shares many engineering principles with jet engines, and often many shared parts.

And generally, for stationary plants, the heat of the exhaust can be used to boil steam and get another cycle's worth of work out of the heat, for even greater efficiency.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 hours ago

This isn't something new. Jet engines have been converted to power use for decades because once they are beyond the aircraft service life they are still useful for generating power

really needs to be killed and all his sons sterilized.