this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
321 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

89588 readers
3472 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 40 points 4 days ago (2 children)

An utterly unworkable, absurdly costly idea. I'm sure the same investor-lemmings who buy heavily into IPOs which have no viable business model will fall for this too.

Underwater data centers are also not that feasible, but they are a lot more feasible than putting one in space.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yep. We already have to deal with waste heat on the ISS, where is the monstrous heat from even a traditional DC to go?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There's only a rack worth of compute on each satellite. There is nothing monstrous to deal with individually. The plans are to put up a very large quantity of these which will sum up to a large amount.

That probably makes training on them less effective, and that would likely remain a land based thing, but for inference, any given person probably doesn't need more than 1 rack of compute to themselves, and if they do, they'd probably be using something land based.