this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
11 points (67.7% liked)

Games

26528 readers
146 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are so many existing games with level editors where you can already do all that. And have been. For decades.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, sure.

...and nobody gives people a hard time for using level editors or game engines or any other tools that they like when trying to learn something.

This is just a new tool, it's useful for some things and not for others.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who is our there making fun of people using level editors? No one has a beef with level editors or modders.

It's the copyright theft environment destroying machines churning out soulless shit that people don't like. Not someone trying to learn a new skill.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, in that case, you should mind your own business about what tools that a person chooses to use and focus on the actual human beings destroying the environment and violating copyright.

You're acting mad at a 100GB block of numbers and ignoring the actual human beings who making the decisions resulting in the dangers that you're talking about.

The problem isn't AI, it's people.