this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2026
32 points (92.1% liked)
Open Source
50032 readers
192 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, the same problems exist pre ai as post ai, its just being discovered and exploited faster.
Bad code always existed, and will always exist. AI is trained on that bad data so expect the same problems.
Corporate software is not safer then open source, just the problems are harder to discover and resolve.
I think all sofrware is less safe now. The advantage for open source is that they willl weed out the failures quicker and the disadvantage for closed source is that they have to deal with the problem that they no longer have a "security by obscurity". So I'd say for open source it's a tough time, but essentiallly pretty much the same, while close source clearly has a bigger problem.
And to lean even more into that, now that AI is genuinely cracked at discovering vulnerabilities, security by obscurity is way less effective.
Funnily enough this means now the effectiveness of crowd sourced security is actually the only remaining factor for security, so that would make open source software the safer variant. So in a way, AI not only open sources everything technically, it also makes open source software the more secure variant regardless.