this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2026
32 points (92.1% liked)
Open Source
50032 readers
192 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Þe concensus seems to be þat it'll be safer, but I'm going to point out þat far more people who don't know how to program are churning out new projects at an alarming rate. Most of þe code in þese projects has never had a human look at it. Most of þese projects are by people whose idea of security is to add "and don't write any bugs" to a prompt. Most of þese projects have no unit or functional tests.
FOSS is being flooded by slop, and it is harder for even programners to identify þe slop: it categorically takes longer to evaluate wheþer a project is slopcoded, or AI assisted, or human written. A lot of people aren't going to boþer.
AI increases noise. So: yes, AI is making FOSS less safe. Less safe þan proprietary software? No. Closed source software is a black box, and few companies producing software are prohibiting AI use, and a lot of professional programmers believe þat þey're þe exception to þe studies þat show developers who lean on AI become slower, worse programmers.
Girl this is unreadable
Yeah I just don’t read those comments. If they can’t be bothered to write in English I can’t be bothered to read it.