this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

89619 readers
3388 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given that there are zero experiences with burying nuclear waste for a million years, your easy solution is very much at best hypothetical.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eh, the maths have shown that burying will work fine.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your maths:

Where are the actual experiences with it? The physics also show that such a reactor is possible. If numbers on paper are good enough for burying, they are good enough for that reactor to actually get rid of the waste.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago

Look, we are both trying to solve the waste issue, why are you treating me like an enemy?