this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
310 points (97.5% liked)
Privacy
11159 readers
226 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some random police employee is probably responsible for inventory management. But the police chief is responsible for that employee and the mayor is responsible for the chief. So if the mayor believes that assets are being misused they have a responsibly to try and figure it out or they become culpable to misused assets. The lack of top down process ownership is a problem these days. Responsibility rarely rolls uphill but it should.
I think you'll find the comment I responded to was saying tracking state property should be the norm.
I'll further guess you'll find that companies have departments for asset protection.
And if you'll stay with me once more. The security team can reference surveillance to check if timesheets are being falsified.
Now to reiterate: at no point was the mayor involed in seeing the actual data rather they would make a request to the relevant parties.