this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
310 points (97.5% liked)
Privacy
11159 readers
226 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So mass surveillance is perfectly fine, because it helps detect crime. Even if it doesn't detect a single crime over the course of 20 years.
But surveillance for police officers is bad, even if it immediately detects crime?