Privacy

51970 readers

759 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

DuckDuckGo vs Brave Search: which one is better for privacy, independence, and result quality? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 days ago by Osm@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi everyone,

I’m choosing a default search engine and I’m torn between DuckDuckGo and Brave Search. What matters most to me:

Privacy: what’s actually logged, and can the claims be trusted? Independence from Big Tech: DDG partly relies on Bing, while Brave has its own index. Result quality: relevance for daily, technical and niche queries. Trust: track record, controversies, business model.

Which one do you use daily, and why? Have you noticed a real quality difference? Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Known sources, digital watermarks, and user-contributed reporting.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I see. Well that makes sense and is indeed useful then.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Note, I have only seen filters for the image search. But there's definitely a lot of slop among the images even though you select to exclude slop. There's just so much slop out there I guess.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I view this comparable to an ad-blocker extension in the browser. It doesn't block all ads, but it does a decent job that the result is usable. Maybe that is the effect, maybe less. As long as they do not heuristic decision and only go about known stuff, then I'm all for it. My first thought was "oh they fight ai with ai", but that is not the case as it seems. But it depends on the sources for that filter. If they use Ai to detect, then I'm not a big fan of the filter.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Indeed. Note also that I'm only certain about the user reporting, as I've done some reporting of my own. I stopped after a while though. There's so much that it feels futile.

But, the other ways of determining should be possible too.