this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
979 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
89678 readers
4726 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe I'm evil, but I'm just happy that he's not raping children.
The bar is very low these days
*That we know of
That probably won't come out until next week when Nvidia have started to distance themselves from him
Or what they showed him after the 2nd affair came out and he said still wouldn't leave?
Oh don't worry, I'm sure you could still six degrees him to child rape.
AI companies that he's artificially inflated due to handing out imaginary billions, which is given back to nvidia in GPU buys, which then goes out to another AI company, which comes back via GPU buys, etc etc etc without any actual, real money changing hands leads to sick fucks getting AI models to generate AI child porn, which leads to child rapists getting hot and bothered and going out and raping living breathing children.
He's been at a table with the President and some others from his administration, so take that for however many degrees you want, but at most two.
Sorry, but that argument still sounds wayyy too much like "video games cause x".
"How dare you say that my AI Child Porn makes me a threat to real children!"
that's musk, not jensen
That last part is quite a claim. Is there some data to back it up, or is it more like a hypothesis?
It's the old issue at the core of discussions about fictional sexual depictions of children in general. Some claim it can act as a harmless alternative outlet, others the opposite that it will encourage people to do actual harm.
I'd be surprised if it was the latter given that similar claims ("violent video games cause violence") have been proven to be bullshit, but to my knowledge there aren't really any studies on it either (probably bc it's hard to do).
Yeah, thats because you cant go out and cast fuckin fireball at a troll in real life.
AI's are trained on real images of real children to generate child porn, its completely realistic and exactly in line with all the other child porn these people are most likely viewing, except thanks to the AI they can sink into their disgusting fucking shit even further by tailoring every fucked up image to their fucked up wants. Theres no bullshit attempt to handwave it away as a drawing and that the character is actually a 9000 year old dragon or whatever other fucked up bullshit. It is unabashedly child exploitation material.
Trying to compare it to video games is a disgusting attempt to distract and deflect.
It's fairly obviously two degrees, if not one.