this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1881 points (99.2% liked)

memes

15345 readers
3582 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

<unwarranted rage No way...

... </rage

This is the wildest syntax I've ever seen! At first, I thought it was unparsable nonsense. Then I realized that your tags are capital-letter-terminated. Is this from a language I don't know or have you unwittingly cooked up a piece of a cursed programming language? If the latter, I propose Slorp as its name.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Closing > for the tag is left as an exercise for the reader.
unwarranted is a property of the rage tag (the properties are declared before the tag name)

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This... This isn't something you can actually do in HTML is it? I've been doing web development for years and I feel like I'm about to learn some horrifically cursed knowledge...

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Nope, it's a CHTML extension. C for cursed, although that's redundant.

HTML goes <br>

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

HTML goes <br>

I'm not sure if that's a "machine goes brrrrrr" joke or not. If it is, it's brilliant. XD

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Closing > for the tag is left as an exercise for the reader.

Lmao that's great

[–] CuriousRefugee@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The real answer is that when I closed the tags, they didn't show up in the comment. So I left them open, because it looked utterly ridiculous. But I like your interpretation way better!

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 2 points 2 days ago

Probably needed to escape them with \