this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1896 points (99.1% liked)

memes

21115 readers
2801 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website
1896
I HATE email (sub.wetshaving.social)
submitted 11 months ago by weird@sub.wetshaving.social to c/memes@lemmy.world
199 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CuriousRefugee@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

<unwarranted rage No way, BONTO! sucked. You couldn't even Slorp your entire friends list anymore, and they added all of those BONTOgrams for no reason. We disagree on a topic, so I despise you now and your entire genetic line. </rage

But you should really try NeWSlarP, a FLOSS fork of Slorp by the original developer that brings back both SlorpTokens and Schlarpmänner!

[–] revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

<unwarranted rage No way...

... </rage

This is the wildest syntax I've ever seen! At first, I thought it was unparsable nonsense. Then I realized that your tags are capital-letter-terminated. Is this from a language I don't know or have you unwittingly cooked up a piece of a cursed programming language? If the latter, I propose Slorp as its name.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Closing > for the tag is left as an exercise for the reader.
unwarranted is a property of the rage tag (the properties are declared before the tag name)

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This... This isn't something you can actually do in HTML is it? I've been doing web development for years and I feel like I'm about to learn some horrifically cursed knowledge...

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Nope, it's a CHTML extension. C for cursed, although that's redundant.

HTML goes <br>

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

oh thank fuck

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 11 months ago

HTML goes <br>

I'm not sure if that's a "machine goes brrrrrr" joke or not. If it is, it's brilliant. XD

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Closing > for the tag is left as an exercise for the reader.

Lmao that's great

[–] CuriousRefugee@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The real answer is that when I closed the tags, they didn't show up in the comment. So I left them open, because it looked utterly ridiculous. But I like your interpretation way better!

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 2 points 11 months ago

Probably needed to escape them with \

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Your end tag for rage is the wrong way and I do hate you and your entire genetic line now

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Are we just turning into the bug aliens from Rick and Morty?