this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
227 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

71665 readers
3562 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Well, at least it was a private company rocket ship and not my tax dollars.... Right?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/musk-government-contracts-spacex-tesla-taxes-b2703141.html

In total, $20.7 billion pleged/paid to SpaceX since 2008, $8.7 billion actually paid as of a few months ago, $3.4 awarded/pledged in just 2024.

Its funny, I remember being raised conservative and being taught that no one spends money as wisely as someone spending their own money.

Welp, thats out the fucking window for all subcontractors, as well as... just give poor/homeless/rent overburdened people money, and they'll help themselves far more efficiently than a giant bureacracy will.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, yes. The advantage of fixed priced contracts over traditional cost plus contracts is that instead of Boeing twiddling their thumbs for three years wasting time trying to figure out why their original design is shit and having the government pay for it, space x is just out a rocket. Government gives 0 shits. I wonder if there penalties built in if it’s behind schedule

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With a functioning federal government I would agree with you. But unfortunately they have an open checkbook right now, with no accountability or critical oversight.

[–] cole@lemdro.id -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I hate to be this guy, but this is just... not true. That's not how this works at all. How is the government giving SpaceX money outside of a contract? They aren't.

Everyone wants to find a reason to hate SpaceX because Musk, but the truth is SpaceX is a well-ran innovative company.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I hate to be this guy

Then don't be. I'm not sure why you feel the need to glaze the world's richest political agent, unless...

Are you a SpaceX employee? You've said this in the past.

Most people at SpaceX genuinely love the mission and will work longer hours because it's almost a passion.

We're pretty well-compensated too.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

"Well-run" implies that of the people running it, i.e. CEO Elon Musk. A quick search on Glassdoor reveals "CEO approval."

I don't expect you to speak negatively about the person who signs your paychecks, especially because he's so obsessed with censoring social media, but when you praise vague "good leadership" and leave it at that, it does make a rational person skeptical.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Please read a bit about Gwynne Shotwell. She's amazing and runs the company very competently.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm way more interested on your opinions of CEO (and Chair and CTO) Elon Musk, especially because you'd apparently rather talk about anybody but him.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You're looking for a "gotcha" but my whole point is that people are judging SpaceX entirely on Elon being involved, rather than it's actual merits.

My opinion shouldn't matter here.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Besides the federal government trying to strong arm governments into purchasing star link?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/05/07/elon-musk-starlink-trump-tariffs/

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

SpaceX is a well-ran innovative company

their rocket just blew up

[–] cole@lemdro.id 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is not evidence to the contrary, especially when the company is intentionally trying to find the limits on a development article.

Falcon 9 (the only rocket they actually sell launches on) is one of the most reliable launch vehicles in the world.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean you’re right in a sense, but usually when I iterate on a design it gets better not worse.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's not fair to say that iteration doesn't ever include any steps back. Development isn't always straightforward and it doesn't always go perfectly.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Well, I did say usually. Regressions happen. I’m just being sarcastic because I don’t like Nazi-owned enterprises. /me shrugs

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is not evidence to the contrary

besides the whole rocket blowing up thing?

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

It's a good thing those cars had working doors

[–] cole@lemdro.id 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

repeating the same thing does not make your point stronger

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Their unmanned test rocket just blew up. Boo hoo