this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
217 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

71665 readers
3382 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] catty@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm starting to wonder how much of these explosions are acts of corporate sabotage.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

This is the way

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Nice. Now they know how to not build that specific one

Trial and error correction people

The best thing is that these launchs are getting cheaper with time

The falcon 9 has an internal launch cost per kilogram of about 1000 USD/KG

If they get starship right (and all evidence points to it getting ready soon) internal launch cost is estimated to be between 200 to 300 USD/KG

We are very close to seeing 25k USD or less tickets to space

Get ready for the future bois, it won't wait for you

[–] shoo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

... And we need 25k space tickets why? For a cool selfie?

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I understand from your comment that, within your limited capacity, it is actually hard , next to impossible even, to imagine the benefits of having cheap orbital and suborbital transportation and infrastructure.

I imagine it must be difficult living that way so I just want to say you are very brave by raising awareness to such disabilities, keep at it, champ, you are doing a great job

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

How difficult is it to communicate to others without letting your ego get in the way? I swear, you people act like literal children sometimes haha

[–] shoo@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I understand from your comment that you've read too many sci-fi books to understand what a massive resource sink that would be with negligible benefit. It's pretty basic physics.

We've already got cheap transportation, look how that's turning out for the planet. But I'm sure burning God knows how much energy to launch more junk into space will save the world.

We're already approaching a critical mass of private equity space trash in orbit, what's a few more lowest-bidder megastructures? At least the ultra rich will get their life rafts while we burn.

[–] Dudeonlemmy@lemm.ee 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Why go anywhere in the world? It's all about the experience man, 25k to have experienced being in space is an incredibly unique and cool experience is it not?

[–] shoo@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Because the world has actual things in it like people, wildlife, culture and history. Space has none of those things. Unless you're there working as a scientist to study things that can't be studied on earth, it's pointless.

As of now it's a glorified roller coaster. At its best private space travel could be Disneyland in space. At worst it's just rich people paying to be carried up mount everest for clout but with exponentially more resources wasted.

I guess he is actually back in charge of his companies.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Well, at least it was a private company rocket ship and not my tax dollars.... Right?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/musk-government-contracts-spacex-tesla-taxes-b2703141.html

In total, $20.7 billion pleged/paid to SpaceX since 2008, $8.7 billion actually paid as of a few months ago, $3.4 awarded/pledged in just 2024.

Its funny, I remember being raised conservative and being taught that no one spends money as wisely as someone spending their own money.

Welp, thats out the fucking window for all subcontractors, as well as... just give poor/homeless/rent overburdened people money, and they'll help themselves far more efficiently than a giant bureacracy will.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, yes. The advantage of fixed priced contracts over traditional cost plus contracts is that instead of Boeing twiddling their thumbs for three years wasting time trying to figure out why their original design is shit and having the government pay for it, space x is just out a rocket. Government gives 0 shits. I wonder if there penalties built in if it’s behind schedule

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With a functioning federal government I would agree with you. But unfortunately they have an open checkbook right now, with no accountability or critical oversight.

[–] cole@lemdro.id -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I hate to be this guy, but this is just... not true. That's not how this works at all. How is the government giving SpaceX money outside of a contract? They aren't.

Everyone wants to find a reason to hate SpaceX because Musk, but the truth is SpaceX is a well-ran innovative company.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I hate to be this guy

Then don't be. I'm not sure why you feel the need to glaze the world's richest political agent, unless...

Are you a SpaceX employee? You've said this in the past.

Most people at SpaceX genuinely love the mission and will work longer hours because it's almost a passion.

We're pretty well-compensated too.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

"Well-run" implies that of the people running it, i.e. CEO Elon Musk. A quick search on Glassdoor reveals "CEO approval."

I don't expect you to speak negatively about the person who signs your paychecks, especially because he's so obsessed with censoring social media, but when you praise vague "good leadership" and leave it at that, it does make a rational person skeptical.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Please read a bit about Gwynne Shotwell. She's amazing and runs the company very competently.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm way more interested on your opinions of CEO (and Chair and CTO) Elon Musk, especially because you'd apparently rather talk about anybody but him.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

You're looking for a "gotcha" but my whole point is that people are judging SpaceX entirely on Elon being involved, rather than it's actual merits.

My opinion shouldn't matter here.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Besides the federal government trying to strong arm governments into purchasing star link?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/05/07/elon-musk-starlink-trump-tariffs/

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

SpaceX is a well-ran innovative company

their rocket just blew up

[–] cole@lemdro.id 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is not evidence to the contrary, especially when the company is intentionally trying to find the limits on a development article.

Falcon 9 (the only rocket they actually sell launches on) is one of the most reliable launch vehicles in the world.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean you’re right in a sense, but usually when I iterate on a design it gets better not worse.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's not fair to say that iteration doesn't ever include any steps back. Development isn't always straightforward and it doesn't always go perfectly.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Well, I did say usually. Regressions happen. I’m just being sarcastic because I don’t like Nazi-owned enterprises. /me shrugs

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is not evidence to the contrary

besides the whole rocket blowing up thing?

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

It's a good thing those cars had working doors

[–] cole@lemdro.id 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

repeating the same thing does not make your point stronger

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Their unmanned test rocket just blew up. Boo hoo

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is actually a triumph for Musk. SpaceX has figured out how to blow up their rockets without all the cost and time required to prepare for a launch.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

I'm making a note here: Huge Success

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

They are getting better at blowing rockets. The goal is a 24h turnaround, blow one rocket, bring a new one and blow it again in less than 24h

[–] forgetful_fox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe we can gaslight him into thinking he's the only one fit to pilot the Starship, making him insist on being aboard it for future tests.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

I mean if he was piloting it, it wouldn’t have blown up! He’s the best and smartest person ever, all the best people are saying it. I think he should definitely pilot them all!

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Early analysis suggests that one of the high-pressure nitrogen gas tanks in the cargo bay ruptured. This would be unrelated to the rocketry aspects of Starship, those tanks are pretty plain vanilla technology and if this is actually what happened it's weird because those tanks are rated for way higher safety margins.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

This only matters to me if he was in it at the time so I can organize a party.

[–] THX1138@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Thoughts and prayers... lol

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Aw, it doesn’t actually call out Elmo in the headline. :(

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Why can’t he just blow up.