this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
643 points (97.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

2975 readers
569 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Skua@kbin.earth 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is libel rather than slander, since it is written and not verbal. But even then, it's not libel either. To be libel (or slander) against a public figure, it has to be factually untrue and Patterson would have to either know that it was untrue or act with disregard for the truth. He's allowed to state his opinion - which he clearly stated as his opinion - that Mamdani isn't a good fit for the position. We can think that Patterson is wrong about that, but he's only wrong (and, in my opinion, strategically foolish), not libellous

[โ€“] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Okay great definition. Now read the Governors statement again.

Did Mamdani 'not have a plan' or does he back up all his funding claims with plans?