this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
169 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

72729 readers
1712 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
169
Bluesky is rolling out age verification in the UK (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 days ago by General_Effort@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Somewhere in a government building in the UK: We did it, Patrick...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Canadian Senate Bill S-209 aims to do the same in Canada. These idiots really want our data so bad.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same in Australia. From memory the law has already passed, it’s just got a delay on it to give companies a chance to implement it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to having a good excuse to delete most of my accounts and move entirely to decentralised platforms.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just hope they (Facebook and friends) give you the choice to delete OR verify those accounts and not require verification to delete it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 18 hours ago

You would be surprised what you can active with spamming angry emails

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for the information.

I found this specific clause very ... porous.

Clarification — commercial purpose 6 For greater certainty, for the purpose of section 5, an organization that incidentally and not deliberately provides a service that is used to search for, transmit, download, store or access content on the Internet that is alleged to constitute pornographic material does not make available pornographic material on the Internet for commercial purposes.

So... I guess Bing will once again be my goto incidental indeliberate porn search engine. And reddit. And Lemmy.

https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/bill/S-209/first-reading

Surprisingly, a conservative senator had a fairly well reasoned, and cautious, (although still supportive), response speech.

https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/451/debates/008db_2025-06-10-e#66

It still has a long way to goto get through senate committee and house readings and committees and all that. Still, might be a good time to scrape all the porn.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Look at Bill S-210 from the last Parliament, it made it to 2nd reading in the House. There is cause for concern.

I appreciate your dive into the topic though. Michael Geist has more info on his website.