this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
91 points (85.8% liked)
Selfhosted
60281 readers
604 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What security problems?
Bots randomly attack stuff, and if you leave something insecure, they'll install a bot net node.
Define "insecure".
Default passwords, old insecure versions of apps and system packages, etc. "Just getting it working" usually leaves things insecure, and you usually need to take things a step further to secure your publicly accessible services.
Not just old insecure, but current insecure too. Plenty of stuff runs fully current but still vulnerable code. Put it behind a firewall.
Sure. My point is that self-hosters tend to let services sit without updates for months if not years at a time. That's fine if you don't expose anything to the internet, so keep that surface area as limited as possible.