this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
389 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

6818 readers
914 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A 22-year-old German politician who secretly served in Ukraine’s army now faces expulsion from the pro-Russian Alternative for Germany party after calling his own leadership “Russia-kissers.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plyth@feddit.org -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With just having read the summary, I would be happy with the limited role that the Heritage foundation suggests.

The Europe of regions sounds also interesting.

I think we need a debate that is expected to last years to come up with a good system. There are reasons for the current structure that are still valid. We can keep going for a while, but we should keep in mind that the influence of the public was minimized.

A quick improvement could come from adopting the fediverse for the EU. It should be easy for citizens to participate in debates.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With just having read the summary, I would be happy with the limited role that the Heritage foundation suggests. The Europe of regions sounds also interesting.

This is exactly what right-wingers in Europe (and China and Russia) are aiming at. This is backward-oriented and has nothing to do with democracy.

[–] plyth@feddit.org -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would a scaleback to national states not be democratic? They were democratic in the past.

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too susceptible to outside influence. These would be American/Russian/corporate puppet states.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

America supposedly has become a Russian puppet state. Size is helpful but not essential. If people give up democratic power they will be ruled by whomever controls the European Commission. Having informed voters is much more important than size.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are a lot of reasons, but as you refer to the Heritage Foundation as an institution to develop democracy, I'm afraid you either wouldn't understand or you are arguing in bad faith.

[–] plyth@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

you refer to the Heritage Foundation as an institution to develop democracy

I didn't. I was talking about their suggestion. I hope you are not arguing in bad faith.

Why would a scaleback to national states not be democratic?

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@plyth@feddit.org

Read your own comment. You literally wrote:

I would be happy with the limited role that the Heritage foundation suggests.

You're are happy with the MAGA playbook.

Why would a scaleback to national states not be democratic?

In short, exactly because - as you say yourself -it is a 'scaleback' and a 'limited role.'

We need to go forward as a larger EU would also be stronger as single national states.

You are apparently arguing in bad faith. Such a debate is,waste of time.

[–] plyth@feddit.org -2 points 2 days ago

Can you distinguish between a message and a messenger? Of course they have further, dangerous plans. But the suggestion at first sounds good, which is to be expected. From the article:

The now-public roadmap includes proposals to strip power from the European Commission and the European Court of Justice. It also calls for renaming the EU to the “European Community of Nations.” Power, according to the document, should return to the individual nation states of Europe.

“These proposals essentially amount to the complete dismantling of the European Commission, which would be reduced to handling only trivial matters,” explains Szabolcs Panyi, the journalist who obtained the document.

Nieuwsuur also spoke with one of the Polish authors of the plan, Zbigniew Przybyłowski of the conservative Ordo Iuris Institute: “We are calling for the restoration of democracy, freedom, and the sovereignty of nations. You could call that a power shift.”

The arguments:

Why would a scaleback to national states not be democratic?

In short, exactly because - as you say yourself -it is a ‘scaleback’ and a ‘limited role.’

We need to go forward as a larger EU would also be stronger as single national states.

Those are two things, power and democracy.

You are willing to get more power while not caring about democracy. If the EU moves forward as is, there will be less democracy.

It could even be false flag. What if the Heritage Foundation wants that concentration of power?

Why do we need it? The EU started as a project for a free market. Even if we need a strong military we can do that without all the other concentration of power.