this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
1405 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

73370 readers
4503 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Collective Shout, a small but vocal lobby group, has long called for a mandatory internet filter that would prevent access to adult content for everyone in Australia. Its director, Melinda Tankard Reist, was recently appointed to the stakeholder advisory board for the government’s age assurance technology trial before the under-16s social media ban comes into effect in Australia in December.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 147 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What's even the argument here? Steam already has parental control options, age gates, and content filters... if you don't want your kids seeing that shit on steam, then, like, don't let em?

...meanwhile, let's just continue shoving blatant gambling down minors' throats in the form of lootboxes.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 66 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This group isn't interested in protecting children they're just interested in pushing their own beliefs on everybody else. The easiest way they can do that is to pretend that they're interested in children. Which I'm sure some of them are, but not in the capacity that anyone wants them to be.

It's a classic right-wing tactic. Because nobody wants to be against a law that protects children.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

They're still going after books too. Any and all media, speech, any kind of communication, which is free from their clawing grasp.

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

“ All dem queer books are hurtin our kids, makin em all gay and shit! “

Says the man standing in front of his trailer with a deep five o’clock shadow spanning his double chin, a permanently stained wife-beating tank top and a prominent beer gut, who has five scrawny & bruised kids, and a wife that bears an eerie resemblance to himself but can’t quite look anyone in the eye.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Oh they're still going after books.

[–] tequinhu@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Which I'm sure some of them are, but not in the capacity that anyone wants them to be.

I laughed, then I cried :_(

[–] Lebensmittel@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The argument is control. Religious zealots are all about controlling society and subduing people to follow their rules (that they themselves tend to break all the time)

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's their goal for sure, what I mean is how are they pretending to justify it?

There's usually some on-paper benevolent veneer to wrap their hateful bullshit up with.

For example, they hate trans people, but they don't campaign on that out loud - they justify that hated under the guise of shit like protecting bathrooms.

But this is fucking Steam - access to that bathroom is already under lock and key behind an armed guard. They can't just pull the "think of the children!" card when the children already have a myriad of protections.

...or maybe they can, considering what just happened. We live in stupid times.

[–] Lebensmittel@sh.itjust.works 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They precisely can and they kinda just did. "Think of the children" is the magic phrase to shut down critical thinking and give you carte blanche to do whatever you want.

[–] ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Not always. School shootings happen and suddenly crickets on gun control. "Think of the children" only applies to moral outrage, not tangible physical threat prevention. Also applies to school lunches and any other actual tangible thing to ACTUALLY benefit general child welfare.

[–] Lebensmittel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago

Sure, I implied moral outrage. It's not like they actually give a damn about the children.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago

"think of the children" WRT school ahootings means more police in American schools and arming American teachers.

[–] stratoscaster@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago

They are quite literally lying about the content of games like GTA V. They pulled the whole "the goal of the game is killing women" schtick

[–] Beero@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They want a nanny state to do their parenting for them, cus they are shit parents who spend their time petitioning the government about things they could just fucking unplug.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Bingo. They're just projecting their failures as inadequate parents because they didn't realize how hard child rearing would be after knocking up their high school sweetheart and buying a white picket fence. It's always the same case.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

That's their goal for sure, what I mean is how are they pretending to justify it?

The same way they always do: "WONT SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?!?!?!1111"

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

And the reason sexual things had to be filtered was that they are harmful and skew kids' perception of healthy sexuality.

Gambling wasn't considered healthy even where and when marrying a toddler was normal. After all, a traumatized person with unhealthy sexuality does generally understand they are traumatized, a person taught that addiction is normal - not.