this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
1147 points (88.5% liked)

Memes

50088 readers
452 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (40 children)

This might get a lot of down votes but I want to say I don't think it's fair to blame the soldiers in the field for the choices of the decision makers in the office. Those horrible events were unwanted 'byproducts' of the goal of men with evil plans, they were not veterans going off-book. In other words, these veterans did what was asked of them. I'm not saying they didn't do some very bad things, but they aren't the people that should be 'thanked'.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Ah, the Nuremberg defense. 😢

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No that would be saying they didn't do anything bad because doing what is asked of you is always good.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_orders

Superior orders, also known as just following orders or the Nuremberg defense, is a plea in a court of law that a person, whether civilian, military or police, should not be considered guilty of committing crimes ordered by a superior officer or official.[1][2] It is regarded as a complement to command responsibility.[3]

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I'm saying we shouldn't blame the soldiers on the choices of their leaders, I'm not saying we shouldn't blame the soldiers for their own choice. I totally agree they could've chosen to not to follow orders. I'm not saying they are innocent. But their role is not comparable to the role of the people giving orders.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)