this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
415 points (98.6% liked)

World News

49036 readers
1808 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mexico’s president says ‘there will be no invasion … it’s absolutely off the table’ after news reports of order

Mexico’s president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has rejected the idea that the US might invade Mexico after news reports suggested Donald Trump had authorized the use of military force targeting drug cartels deemed terrorist organizations in Latin American countries.

“The United States is not going to come to Mexico with their military,” she said during a daily news conference on Friday. “We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion. It’s off the table, absolutely off the table.”

The Mexican president said her government had been informed of the executive order but insisted that “it had nothing to do with the participation of any military or any institution on our territory. There is no risk that they will invade our territory.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

You know what would be an even better distraction? Actually invading Mexico. You're brushing off this threat and not taking it seriously just like the first election as if he can't possibly be serious and no serious person would go along with it anyway. You can't just sloganeer your way out of this. Hitler is telling us he wants to own the rest of Europe and murder all the Jews. The first of the concentration camps are already complete. He has already begun rounding up undesirables en masse, with effective legal impunity. What the fuck makes you so fucking certain he doesn't want to invade France too?! Wake the fuck up.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

The first of the concentration camps are already complete.

The first of the domestic ones. There's still plenty of blacksites all over the world, most notably Salvador, lately.

I seriously can't fathom how anybody can still say "He's probably bluffing again. It's just a joke."

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstood me. I do in fact consider it a very serious threat. In fact basically everything trump does is a very serious threat. That's just reality and I think you and I would both agree on that.

I want to make one thing clear, I see absolutely no reason to listen to trump, he is at best a liar, a criminal, and a traitor.

That being said a threat for the sake of distraction, whether empty or not, perfectly fits one of his common propaganda techniques. It would make perfect sense that he is deflecting from something he doesn't want the public to pay attention to, and in my opinion that means the correct course of action(at least for a powerless shmuck like me) is to pay the fuck attention to that thing and to get other people to pay attention to that too. It makes sense that the Epstein files are that thing, since it seems to be one of the only things his base sees as controversial, hence my original comment.

So well that's currently my plan, you got a better one?

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

yeah no doubt i did.

im sorry i didnt mean to say- I was upset when i wrote that, hard not to be, times bein'. i only meant to say two things can be true at once, just because we need to keep our eye on the ball with this epstein business doesn't mean he won't succeed in distracting us from it by doing something that is more nearly in the realm of "normal execution of presidential duties" like invading another country without bothering to get congress' opinion on the matter, for which there is plenty of precedent.

as for plan? fuuuuck no. I'm figuring we have been sitting around waiting for this liberal utopia to kick in any day now while the dystopiists have been staying up late every night to make sure that doesn't happen, and now, just now we're realizing we've been in a race and missed the buzzer by like a couple decades. People been shouting from the rooftops about "fascist" this and "authoritarian creep" that and it feels like rather than a slow wave of creep its rather the inflection point of a sudden tsunami flood. with all the worst people from 4chan running the fucking country, how can you plan around chaos? isn't that the point of the chaos to begin with?