this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
187 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

3819 readers
559 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How EU digital identity rules and Google's restrictive policies threaten the future of privacy-focused Android operating systems like GrapheneOS.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250810234024/https://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2025/08/10/whos-afraid-of-privacy-focused-smartphones/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you really think that the average person who pays in app by a non-Apple payment method is going to understand that Apple isn’t the company to contact given they have been for all this time?

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

App Store itself directs those people to 3rd parties in those cases.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 day ago

What the app store says is irrelevant because people aren't going to get their credit card details stolen via a app on their iPhone and then go read up on the app store who to contact - they'll contact apple.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are lots of people who make that assumption. These are also the most likely demographic to fall for a fake App Store scam.

That said, Apple have done a piss-poor job pruning their “Walled Garden”. If they really cared about user privacy, Facebook would have been banned multiple times for privacy violations.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 day ago

These are also the most likely demographic to fall for a fake App Store scam.

When they could only pay via Apple's payment processor in-app this wasn't an issue. Now it is.