this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
195 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

7327 readers
308 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How EU digital identity rules and Google's restrictive policies threaten the future of privacy-focused Android operating systems like GrapheneOS.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250810234024/https://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2025/08/10/whos-afraid-of-privacy-focused-smartphones/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If govts actually start making stuff like grapheneos illegal, maybe I'll just stop using smartphones. If they're gonna be that blatant about wanting to be a surveillance state, then I see little reason to help them.

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think it is quite hard to avoid smartphone nowadays because some necessities such as: ID, messaging, banking etc almost requires smartphones.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

While it'd be difficult, you can usually make do with a browser or visiting in-person (e.g. with a bank, they need to know who you are anyway, so visiting in-person is mostly just an inconvenience). Physical ID is likely still going to be a thing for the forseeable future since at minimum there are bunch of old people who basically don't know how to use smartphones (or at least use them well).

Messaging is more problematic. You could probably use a combination of something that functions on your computer and a dumb phone for urgent things (although since texts/calls wouldn't be E2EE, you'd have to assume the govt knows the contents of the convo).

IMO it's entirely feasible just quite inconvenient.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

It will be inconvenient, but I'm right there with you.

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Digital ID or passport with smartphone is there and even many EU countries embraces and hell even ICAO endorse it. The future for world with smartphone only is closer.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I personally don't think that's really feasible unless they provide smartphones for every citizen themselves, and even then people like my grandparents would basically not be able to live given that they only barely know how to message me (and even that they do wrong sometimes, so...). They can certainly make it difficult without a smartphone, but they likely can't completely eliminate physical IDs until those issues are gone.

EDIT: also, if that does become an issue at some point, you can keep your smartphone off unless necessary and don't use a simcard. When on keep it in airplane mode. If you need a connection to use digital ID, do it briefly over wifi (since presumably most places you'd need digital ID would have wifi) and then turn it back off. While not perfect, this would probably be good enough for most people.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are all no necessities whete I sit. I use TAN generators for banking. I use Signal and Matrix for messaging.

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal requires a smartphone bro and for matrix (outside of discord). it just normal user does not know about it.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

You can use Signal on a Linux system or a Google-free tablet. I use LineageOS and GrapheneOS on my smartphones and WiFi tablets. Obviously, I'm not a normal user.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

No maybe about that. A MiFi router and a tablet would be a workaround. If they outlaw general computers that would be it, no more computers for me.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

has anyone questioned who is behind all this age verification all over the place, including forcing the credit card bans of the games, on one reddit post, someone said russel vought is behind all of this, but i cant find anymore info other than the post.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The credit card game bans are all coming from one Australian Religious group.

Similar Astroturf groups are being used to create fake grassroots community groups to PrOtEcT tHe ChIlDrEn.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's not so true. MasterCard wanted an excuse to do this anyways. You can tell because the bigger backlash does not sway them at all.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I think there is an ounce of truth in that, but Corporations don’t “want” things. Investors want dividends and ROI. Executives want golden handshakes. Employees want a pay cheque.

Someone is financing the Astroturf campaigns. Someone is directing who they lobby.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's a cooperation between:

  • religious fundamentalist christian groups, many of which done some rebranding to appeal at least somewhat secular (Collective Shout, NCOSE - formerly Morality In Media, or even the European CitizenGo), while others are still primarily religious fundamentalists (Exodus Cry, Seven Mountain Dominion),
  • big tech companies like Google, who want to tie their users' data to real identities, want to lock down their ecosystems even more, and don't really care about potential bans under a far-right christian theocracy as long as they benefit from it economically and finacially.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CutieBootieTootie@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

Can you not read? WEF - not JEW.

[–] CutieBootieTootie@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

The American led world is clearly losing its position as the global leader. These supposedly free societies are clamping down, because their economic situation is getting more dire, and because discontent will be arising naturally out of that and they know.

This is the natural conclusions of a ruling class at odds with humanity and at odds with our class, the working class.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've been saying for YEARS that the EU has been overstepping their bounds by forcing companies to do things that they should have no right to force them to do, and that the EU is becoming a threat. I was downvoted every time and called a "bootlicker" because people loved the EU dictating terms to the "big bad american corporations".

Well now the EU have gone full nanny surveilance state, and people like those who argued against me have no one to blame but themselves. Congratulations.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I totally agree. Lots of people don't seem to understand centralized authoritarian control is the big evil, even if it reinforces your personal politics (for now).

[–] The_Grinch@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

The EU is good when they're doing good things, and bad when they're doing bad things. Someone has to reign in international corporations and their anti-consumer anti-planet bullshit.

people .. who argued against me have no one to blame but themselves. You really think people agreeing or disagreeing with you on the internet have/had anything to do with it?

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

The EU must be less of a state and more like EFTA

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how home-grown European companies like Fairphone will be affected by this.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mixed. They sell phones with "standard" Android and /e/OS. "standard" Android could potencially have strong Google Play Integrity API support, while /e/OS which uses open source MicroG can only get basic Google Play Integrity API support.

But since API check can be required by app developer for any reason, it can easily be abused or mandated by law like age verification or chat control.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I wonder what future there is for non google phones like fairphone, or even apple. Do apple phones use google things?

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. I'm unsure of where I heard it so take with a grain of salt but I've heard they make about the same number of calls to Google servers as a stock android phone.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

As far as I know it's only the case with Safari using Google Safe Browsing service and Google being the default search.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Although I would prefer to roll-my own but Ubuntu Touch, postmarketOS and SailfishOS all run on the FairPhone.

YMMV for software support, but the non-Android Linux-based phone OSs will suit most people’s needs, as long as Angry Birds isn’t a killer feature of their phone.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eikihj@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So far as I can see, this is just speculation (and propaganda!). Regarding European Digital Identity Wallet which the article says is under development, this would be an app you don't neccessarily have to install on your phone (and it might not be possible to install if it requires some google-pay api).

[–] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

If they depend exclusively on the Google safety net attestation service this is true. GrapheneOS supports even stronger attestation though, they just have to choose to implement it properly: https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

European Digital Identity Wallet is the reference implementation under which each member state can model their own to access all governmental services. It will effectively be mandatory for citizens to do anything. It's also planned to be part of the EU age verification implementation.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Third party app stores would also break this

load more comments
view more: next ›