this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
187 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

3819 readers
560 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How EU digital identity rules and Google's restrictive policies threaten the future of privacy-focused Android operating systems like GrapheneOS.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250810234024/https://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2025/08/10/whos-afraid-of-privacy-focused-smartphones/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If govts actually start making stuff like grapheneos illegal, maybe I'll just stop using smartphones. If they're gonna be that blatant about wanting to be a surveillance state, then I see little reason to help them.

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it is quite hard to avoid smartphone nowadays because some necessities such as: ID, messaging, banking etc almost requires smartphones.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

While it'd be difficult, you can usually make do with a browser or visiting in-person (e.g. with a bank, they need to know who you are anyway, so visiting in-person is mostly just an inconvenience). Physical ID is likely still going to be a thing for the forseeable future since at minimum there are bunch of old people who basically don't know how to use smartphones (or at least use them well).

Messaging is more problematic. You could probably use a combination of something that functions on your computer and a dumb phone for urgent things (although since texts/calls wouldn't be E2EE, you'd have to assume the govt knows the contents of the convo).

IMO it's entirely feasible just quite inconvenient.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

It will be inconvenient, but I'm right there with you.

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Digital ID or passport with smartphone is there and even many EU countries embraces and hell even ICAO endorse it. The future for world with smartphone only is closer.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I personally don't think that's really feasible unless they provide smartphones for every citizen themselves, and even then people like my grandparents would basically not be able to live given that they only barely know how to message me (and even that they do wrong sometimes, so...). They can certainly make it difficult without a smartphone, but they likely can't completely eliminate physical IDs until those issues are gone.

EDIT: also, if that does become an issue at some point, you can keep your smartphone off unless necessary and don't use a simcard. When on keep it in airplane mode. If you need a connection to use digital ID, do it briefly over wifi (since presumably most places you'd need digital ID would have wifi) and then turn it back off. While not perfect, this would probably be good enough for most people.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These are all no necessities whete I sit. I use TAN generators for banking. I use Signal and Matrix for messaging.

[–] moe90@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Signal requires a smartphone bro and for matrix (outside of discord). it just normal user does not know about it.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

You can use Signal on a Linux system or a Google-free tablet. I use LineageOS and GrapheneOS on my smartphones and WiFi tablets. Obviously, I'm not a normal user.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

No maybe about that. A MiFi router and a tablet would be a workaround. If they outlaw general computers that would be it, no more computers for me.