this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
187 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

3819 readers
560 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How EU digital identity rules and Google's restrictive policies threaten the future of privacy-focused Android operating systems like GrapheneOS.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250810234024/https://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2025/08/10/whos-afraid-of-privacy-focused-smartphones/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

has anyone questioned who is behind all this age verification all over the place, including forcing the credit card bans of the games, on one reddit post, someone said russel vought is behind all of this, but i cant find anymore info other than the post.

The American led world is clearly losing its position as the global leader. These supposedly free societies are clamping down, because their economic situation is getting more dire, and because discontent will be arising naturally out of that and they know.

This is the natural conclusions of a ruling class at odds with humanity and at odds with our class, the working class.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The credit card game bans are all coming from one Australian Religious group.

Similar Astroturf groups are being used to create fake grassroots community groups to PrOtEcT tHe ChIlDrEn.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's not so true. MasterCard wanted an excuse to do this anyways. You can tell because the bigger backlash does not sway them at all.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

I think there is an ounce of truth in that, but Corporations don’t “want” things. Investors want dividends and ROI. Executives want golden handshakes. Employees want a pay cheque.

Someone is financing the Astroturf campaigns. Someone is directing who they lobby.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a cooperation between:

  • religious fundamentalist christian groups, many of which done some rebranding to appeal at least somewhat secular (Collective Shout, NCOSE - formerly Morality In Media, or even the European CitizenGo), while others are still primarily religious fundamentalists (Exodus Cry, Seven Mountain Dominion),
  • big tech companies like Google, who want to tie their users' data to real identities, want to lock down their ecosystems even more, and don't really care about potential bans under a far-right christian theocracy as long as they benefit from it economically and finacially.
[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s literally neither of those lol.

Governments are doing this because they want control and they want to know all the stuff that Google and Apple etc know. It’s got nothing to do with religion or big tech lol.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It just happens that those people pushing for it happen to be extremely religious. Nothing to see here, if we ever got our rights back and not everything will go to crap, we don't have to set up provisions so that a small religious extremist minority cannot get hold on our governments. In fact, those christian extremists weren't "real christians", they just pretended to be one, because my interpretation of the bible only include the good parts and I ignore the bad parts.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 day ago

In sue what world you’re living in, but in the one where these digital id laws are being pushed in all the big western countries, the anti-Christian governments are all in power.

The USA are the only one where the extremely religious Christian’s have any real power and they’re the only country pushing back.

What exactly are you basing your argument on?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CutieBootieTootie@hexbear.net 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 day ago

Can you not read? WEF - not JEW.