this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
298 points (97.2% liked)

World News

49162 readers
2057 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I guess the question is, what's Russia's endgame from all this? Because if we say that the Russian army of today is superior to the Russian army of 2022, which is debatable because while they are more competent, they also lost insane amounts of material, both ground, sea and air war machines; the Russian economy is still worse than it was before?

So what can Russia do with its improved army? Invade the Baltics? That's a non-starter because of the EU. Invade Georgia? The only significance of that is that it prevents Europe from having an alternative oil and gas supplier than Russia. Invade Kazakhstan or the Caucasus? Wouldn't that just create another Afghanistan/Ukraine moment where the rest of the world can just send random shit to that country and delete Russian divisions?

Russia also lost the Middle East, meaning Syria is gone and even Iran has its own problems. I'm just not seeing any way forward from this, even if they can patch the economy together.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 13 hours ago

they also lost insane amounts of material, both ground, sea and air war machines;

Intended for obsolete paradigm of war, a lot of them. Very expensive, old and not so efficient. And not just "lost", also "tested in real life conditions".

So what can Russia do with its improved army?

Defend from whatever it fears in the future, that's probably their idea. If you are expecting a war, due to paranoia or not, this might seem justified. Similar to how averting a hunger is far easier than going through it, because during a hunger people who die also consume food before it, just not enough, and work with worse efficiency. In case of such a war of defense your preserved materiel and people will be expended possibly far less efficiently than in a smaller war to get some experience.

My whole line in this thread is that such a strategy seems to be consistent with the claims of feeling threatened by NATO, officially expressed by Russian officials since 00s. It's funny, but it's really so.

Russia also lost the Middle East, meaning Syria is gone and even Iran has its own problems. I’m just not seeing any way forward from this, even if they can patch the economy together.

Perhaps it's optimization. Doesn't matter how much you are trying to hold under control if you are not succeeding. Similarly to hunger.

Anyway, this is me playing devil's advocate.