this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
91 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

62398 readers
366 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see that when people ask for music servers, people frequently suggest Navidrome or mpd/mopidy. I haven't tried either. I'm just using Jellyfin as an all-in-one. I'm wondering why do people choose to use a dedicated music server over an all-in-one like Jellyfin?

Is the extra overhead worth it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Clients often are better suited for music, specially for mobile. For example with Subsonic clients (Navidrome, Gonic, etc), the client aggressively caches the queued songs, which is super helpful when there are hiccups in the network while traveling. A few clients allow me to configure the cache size, allow me to mark some titles are always cached, allow me to browse the cache (case I don't have network at all). It's just way better suited for music.

And on the desktop clients are way lighter weight.

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ultrasonic caches too much, on my phone. It has a limiter, but for some reason ignores it. Once a year I have to go and nuke the whole app because it's using all 120 gigs available 🙃

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It's a feature not a bug 🤪

[–] ReedReads@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wasn’t aware that the client cached the playlist. That’s pretty great.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Ultrasonic and DSub(2000) both do. It's so incredibly useful on roadtrips. Works really really well. I have the app live on the as card in my phone and keep the cache at a massive 100Gb, I have all my favorite music stores, in flac, ready to go at all times.