this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
1253 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74545 readers
3741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The first problem is the name. It's NOT artificial intelligence, it's artificial stupidity.

People BOUGHT intelligence but GOT stupidity.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

It's frustrating because they used the technical term in a knowingly misleading way.

LLMs are artificial intelligence in the same way that a washing machines load and soil tuning systems are. Which is to say they are intelligent, but so are ants, earthworms, and slime molds. The detect stimuli, and react based on that stimuli.

They market it as though "artificial intelligence" means "super human reasoning", "very smart", or "capable of thought" when it's really a combination of "reacts to stimuli in a meaningful fashion" and "can appear intelligent".

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

the ceo and csuites did, they hyped all up and was excited for its innovation.

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Artificial Imbecility

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a search engine with a natural language interface.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

An unreliable search engine that lies

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It obfuctates its sources, so you don't know if the answer to your question is coming from a relevant expert, or the dankest corners of reddit...it all sounds the same after it's been processed by a hundred billion GPUs!

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

yup, i was looking some terms, or conditions up, it was USING stuff froma blog, and sites that just stole from other sites.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what I try to explain to people but they just see it as a Google thats always correct

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

Garbage in, garbage out.

That's from back in the days of PUNCH-CARD computers.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

People will accept either intelligence or stupidity. They will pay for a flattering sycophant.