Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
view the rest of the comments
The people have been lied to by Belarus - make it a problem of Belarus. Raise the UN concern, sanction the fuckers to shreds.
You think you'll help people if you just let them in? They'll scale this shit 10 times and more and more people would get hurt. You are dealing with hostile government, they have resources to do that (especially that it's net positive for them as they take payments from them).
Belarus already is sanctioned. Humanitarian duties are not dependent on who is responsible. It is the legal obligation of Poland and the EU to provide for these people. It is equally their legal obligation not to torture them, push them back across the border or in some cases kill them.
Belarus cannot scale up these operations indefinitely and it would be comparable easy for the EU to deport people back to Iraq or other countries of origin, if it is found that they are not at a danger in those countries. They are undeniably at danger in the "death zone" between the border fences.
In the current situation Putin and Lukashenko get exactly what they want. They can show to the world that the EU countries are criminals, who give fuck all about human rights and international law when it doesn't fit their larger political goals. Furthermore it helps keeping the narrative of refugee "crisis" going, which helps the Russian backed Fascists like the AfD, Front National and the like. By simply not making it a crisis, it wouldn't be a crisis, but the deep rooted Racism in the "middle" of many EU countries pushes them to imagine a crisis and help the Fascists. They also know that this helps the Fascists but they keep doing it, because less Racism and more human rights is seen as worse than a Fascist takeover.
Meanwhile countries like Poland, Germany, France, Italy and others are running into a demographic crisis. They urgently need younger people. By reinforcing the hatred towards migrants and refugees, Russia also helps maintain the EU to get weaker demographically. A problem Russia is facing at an unprecedented level themselves, now that they send their young men to die in Ukraine by the hundreds of thousands.
The government that uses these humans as pawns in their power game will not care for them.
You cannot win a power game by racing to the bottom with the opponent. The sanctions will hit the devasted people living in a brutal dictatorship and the only way to directly hit the perpetrators is by establishing rules on the movement of capital and that will be prevented by a multitude of moneyed interests.
"Just send them back" is the naive approach.
Thats how the sanctions are supposed to work. You hit people, people's live conditions deteriorate rapidly and they riot.
So starved and (militarily) uneducated people should revolt against a dictatorship with fighter jets and drones? Or are you starving them enough so that they won't pay the military or mercenaries? What kind of revolutionary nostalgia is this, we aren't living in the 1800s any more.
Fine, you are right, lets just do business as usual with them. I mean why shouldn't we trade with countries that dream to counquer us?
My point is that there are sanctions that would hit them and we must pass those. The moment we try to justify the preventable mass deportation and mass starvation of others we lose to gametheory.
To be fair though, "Just let them in" isn't very promising either, if you're not keen on having far-right governments..
The far-right governments are not being voted in based on material shortcomings produced through immigration or refugees.
There are material shortcomings based largely on wealth inequality and the immigrants/refugees are a scapegoat.
If we start throwing others under the bus to appease the far right we lose by default. We must demand and provide a life of dignity for everyone, this is a distribtuion issue.
True. But they are voted in based on perceived or feared material shortcomings produced through immigration or refugees. And they are scarily successful with this.
In politics, emotions can be as important as facts, whether we like that or not. When after Fukushima the German sentiment towards nuclear power soured even further, the government reacted although nuclear power rationally didn't become more unsafe there, it was a decision largely based on emotions. (Absolutely not trying to incite one of these toxic online nuclear debates, just the first example that came to my mind)
I guess the main problem here is that there is no rock-solid and clearly transparent mechanism in Europe governing refugees and immigration. Or even clearly distinguishing the two. Each country is tinkering with its own solution, although European laws and regulations exist and overlap each other. Some regulations such as Dublin only exist on paper, some countries don't want to participate at all.
All of this leads to a system that fails to convey trust. And if the population has doubts in a system, it is very easy for an extreme party to further accelerate these doubts.
Yeah, I am there with you. There is a book ont the topic thatI like (altough I disagree on many things with the author) called "the way is shut" by benjamin studebaker. It is way too expensive, but I heard of some pdfs somewhere...