this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
244 points (96.9% liked)

World News

49438 readers
2195 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She made particular reference to Reuters' reporting on Israel's killing of prominent Al-Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif and six other media workers on August 10, saying the agency had "perpetuate[d] Israel's propaganda". She said it had been "wilfully abandoning the most basic responsibility of journalism" by publishing the "baseless claim" from the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) that Al-Sharif was an operative for Hamas.

An initial report published by Reuters received backlash after running with the headline: "Israel kills Al Jazeera journalist it says was Hamas leader".

Zink said she could no longer wear her press pass without feeling "shame and grief", as she shared an image of her press card snapped in half alongside her statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They should not be repeating lies.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I can understand that view, but I think it’s newsworthy to know what a government is claiming in order to be able to refute the claim. As I said, the article makes it very clear that nothing the Israeli government has claimed is verified and they cite multiple sources that counter Israel’s narrative.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So Reuters reported that Israel bombed the hospital on purpose because they saw a camera right?

https://archive.is/iLqRZ

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would also be prudent to mention that Israel has a history of lying about this particular topic. They didn't have any issues making that claim attachment when Russia was encroaching on Crimea, and the Kremlin was denying it.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just went back to some 2014 articles about Crimea and I’m not finding what you’re referencing, can you give me a hand?

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's pretty much impossible to find an article where the journalist treats the Russian soldiers as unknown or neutral parties and almost just as hard to find articles that give the full statements from the Kremlin without the implication being that it's not a proper explanatory statement given the situation. The reason is the statements filling the majority of the body are from western sources, which were more reputable in that instance.

To your point on covering Israel, it would be in the interest of telling the story accurately to mention that journalists are vetted through the IDF and all footage is subject to that vetting as well as who is allowed in. The factual model you present breaks down when access is limited, both by the IDF killing journalists and by limiting the eyes on the ground journalists, their equipment, their film, and their employees at every level. If you control the opposition's ability to communicate reality, then you win under that model, but other news models like what Zeteo does mentions those things and the perspective is prioritized with the proper rarity and reputation that it actually has.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn’t know that about the vetting of journalists. You think there is access journalism at play in terms of the favorable treatment in articles or is it just plain old bias?

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's both. You don't bite the hand that feeds you as hard as it might deserve to be bitten. Selection bias is the main thing I see in news. They wouldn't have that position long if they engaged in wrong-think or pointed the camera in the wrong class' direction.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A claim not published needs no refutation.

Reporting what people say is the domain of gossip magazines. Report the facts of what people do.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The claim is published by Israel regardless of whether or not Reuters reports it. Reporting what governments say is the job of the media as the fourth estate, imo.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Reporting what governments say is the job of the media as the fourth estate, imo.

Not exactly. To paraphrase the well known example, the job of the fourth estate is not to say "the government says it's raining". It is to look outside and tell us if the government is telling the truth.