this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
71 points (98.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34354 readers
770 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As I am sure most of the world is aware of the monopoly that Ticketmaster have regarding events, I was wondering if anyone had any ideas on how to defeat them little by little or otherwise.

I have seen many campaigns, including one from before live nation was formed, in an attempt to prevent it. The juggernaut that it is, easily bats away any attempt to take it on, they are not even afraid of the US government trying to break up the monopoly.

They have been caught many times globally breaking and bending laws, and have a very unethical form of practice. Ticket prices just keep going up along with nonsense charges.

Would love to see ideas to help defeat them.

EDIT - Would lobbying politicians help? (Not sure if lobbying is the correct word). I mean, would having a pre-written letter template being sent to the correct politicians work if a load of people were to sign it and send it in, similar to the fightchatcontrol.eu site.

Which politicians to email?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

And make these dumb fucking celebrities understand that they are just as big a problem by going to these people.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Pearl Jam tried at what was pretty much the peak of their career and it didn't go well for them. Ticketmaster holds an illegal monopoly and should be forced to allow other players to sell tickets to the venues that they have in a stranglehold.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did they really try?

Seems like a popular group such as pearl jam could get away with selling tickets without this company.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, they really did try. And because pretty much all large venues are Ticketmaster-only, they cancelled a tour in 1994.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

pretty much all

What about the ones that weren't ticketmaster-only?

I find it hard to believe they couldn't find a place to have their shows. Maybe in a major city, but if they were willing to go outside of one then there's no way ticketmaster is going to have control over everything.

It could've been good business for the towns they played in and ticketmaster would be left out to dry.

I guess that's asking too much of them, though. Even though it's really not.

I'm going to have to say nay on their attempt. They could have and should have tried harder.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's what they tried. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalogy_Tour#History

Pearl Jam promoted Vitalogy with tours in Asia, Oceania, and the United States in 1995. [...] The band continued its boycott against Ticketmaster during its tour of the United States, refusing to play in Ticketmaster's venue areas, but was surprised that virtually no other bands joined it in refusing to play at Ticketmaster venues. The band chose to use alternate ticketing companies for the shows.

The tour of the United States faced various troubles. Bassist Jeff Ament said that the band and its crew had to "[build] shows from the ground up, a venue everywhere we went." [...]

About cancelling the dates, Vedder said, "I think we all agreed that it had gotten insane, that it was no longer about the music." Ament later said, "We were so hardheaded about the 1995 tour. Had to prove we could tour on our own, and it pretty much killed us, killed our career."

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So... what was the problem? How did it get "insane"?

Is it because nobody else "big" joined them? Is it because, and hear me out, they decide it was no longer worth the money?

Setting up shows in venues that do not normally host large concerts is a lot of work, obviously.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seems like artists would have some way of setting up shows outside of Ticketmaster's control.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 9 points 3 days ago

Not in any way that would be meaningful for bands that tour internationally and play for tens of thousands. Pretty much all large venues have exclusive contracts with Ticketmaster.

Smaller bands, sure.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It’s not really up to the celebrities, I’m afraid. The venues themselves have exclusivity deals with LiveNation, and pretty much every venue that’s at least of medium size has this deal. I guess you could say “then don’t perform at those venues” but imagine Metallica performing in a 100-person venue… that’s kind of unfair to all the people that want to see them

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Go back to the traditional way of renting them for a party at your place?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Not to mention the musicians often don't have control over their tour schedules.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You don't get that they can choose who what and where to go. They could make a shitty no name stadium a good one. There are no excuses for rich privileged children. Which unfortunately is most of them.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The shitty no name stadium probably also has an exclusive contract with LiveNation. Or else it just doesn't host live performances in general, in which case it simply doesn't have the infrastructure to host a huge band.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

in which case it simply doesn’t have the infrastructure to host a huge band.

What infrastructure? Amps? That's a non-issue.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Business and personel infrastructure.

[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su -2 points 2 days ago

I completely agree with you.

The whole atmosphere surrounding live shows is toxic as fuck. There are literally millions of useful idiots eager to get ripped off so they can fit in with each other.

It's a force that logic can't fight back against. We live in a world of morons, and seeing them get taken advantage of in this way is something we should just get used to.

I'm not holding my breath expecting things to change. My generation certainly wasn't the one to fix these problems.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago

It is not that simple. The DOJ filed a lawsuit against Ticketbastard last year over their monopolistic practises although the suit will probably be dropped if they pucker up and kiss the oily rectum of the insane clown pressie.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm hesitant to blame the celebrities on this one. Putting on a concert is a business proposition not just for the venue and ticketing (dis)service, but also for the performers. As with any business venture, the goal is to profit. Larger acts often have large set pieces to create and massive amounts of equipment to transport, not to mention all the labor that goes into setting up at each venue. Can't make the economics of that work if you don't have enough seats to sell, and Ticketmaster/LiveNation owns the lion's share of those large venues.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You cant be serious? Are you going to defend the people who kept TicketMaster in power? Without their concerts they wouldn’t be a business? Todays the day we should learn about choice and free will. Because theyre freely choosing ticketmaster. E-concerts would be cheaper more worthwhile and guess who never gets a dollar?

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Lol. Who tf is gonna pay for an e-concert? You know you can just listen to the band on spotify, right? The point of going to a concert is:

  1. Posting that you went to a concert on social media, apparently.
  2. Dancing in the pit while the music rattles your bones.
  3. Spending time with your friends who like the band, and meeting other people who like the band and making friends.

None of these things are possible when you are watching someone play on a screen at home.