58
Lawyer caught using AI-generated false citations in court case penalised in Australian first
(www.theguardian.com)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
You seem to have a very high expectation of professionalism.
Trained professionals who are supposed to have skills and knowledge and experience make mistakes all the time, sometimes through ineptitude, but also through laziness.
Whether it's Doctors, lawyers, accountants, architects, any profession really. In many or most cases the client doesn't suffer real harm, or if they do the costs of litigation would be higher than the compensation.
A referral to a professional body is usually not very serious. Doctors are referred to the board for malpractice all the time.
I'm a tax consultant. We're regulated by the Tax Practitioners Board. I find it extraordinarily unlikely that they would take someone's license over a submission to the ATO that relied on false cases. Basically they only take action in cases where there is little or no doubt that the practitioner sought to intentionally mislead the tax office.
So, you personally might not think the penalties are harsh, but I can assure you that restricting someone's license to practice, whatever their profession, is a measure usually reserved for fraudulent behavior.