this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
29 points (72.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60451 readers
933 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
29
Frustratingly bad at self hosting. Can someone help me access LLMs on my rig from my phone (lemmy.zip)
submitted 9 months ago by BlackSnack@lemmy.zip to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

tl-dr

-Can someone give me step by step instructions (ELI5) on how to get access to my LLM's on my rig from my phone?

Jan seems the easiest but I've tried with Ollama, librechat, etc.

.....

I've taken steps to secure my data and now I'm going the selfhosting route. I don't care to become a savant with the technical aspects of this stuff but even the basics are hard to grasp! I've been able to install a LLM provider on my rig (Ollama, Librechat, Jan, all of em) and I can successfully get models running on them. BUT what I would LOVE to do is access the LLM's on my rig from my phone while I'm within proximity. I've read that I can do that via wifi or LAN or something like that but I have had absolutely no luck. Jan seems the easiest because all you have to do is something with an API key but I can't even figure that out.

Any help?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah. But it also messes stuff up from the llama.cpp baseline, and hides or doesn't support some features/optimizations, and definitely doesn't support the more efficient iq_k quants of ik_llama.cpp and its specialzied MoE offloading.

And that's not even getting into the various controversies around ollama (like broken GGUFs or indications they're going closed source in some form).

...It just depends on how much performance you want to squeeze out, and how much time you want to spend on the endeavor. Small LLMs are kinda marginal though, so IMO its important if you really want to try; otherwise one is probably better off spending a few bucks on an API that doesn't log requests.